[racket] size_t and FFI?

From: Robby Findler (robby at eecs.northwestern.edu)
Date: Sun Feb 10 19:39:47 EST 2013

ryanc/db.plt jaymccarthy/opencl.plt and jaymccarthy/zeromq.plt all have it.
I stopped searching at that point.


On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones <tonyg at ccs.neu.edu>wrote:

> On 2013-02-10 9:00 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > I think that's likely to be right for all platforms where Racket runs,
> > but we should define it in one place.
> Cool.
> > Should we add `_size' to `ffi/unsafe', risking collisions with existing
> > code?
> This sounds best to me. (And while I think it should be _size_t, that
> would be inconsistent with the existing _uintXY etc. Hmm. Never mind.)
> There is no _size identifier in any of the current Racket codebase, so
> no collisions there. Does anyone have a full greppable snapshot of
> planet to check?
> Cheers,
>   Tony
> ____________________
>   Racket Users list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20130210/22d05188/attachment.html>

Posted on the users mailing list.