[racket] generator performance

The simulation collection uses continuations extensively - in essence
it is a continuation engine - and I get very good performance from it,
even for very large simulations.

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Matthias Felleisen
<matthias at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>
> On Sep 16, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Patrick Useldinger wrote:
>
>> Which makes me wonder if continuations are really usable in Racket (in terms of performance)?
>
>
> That is a good question, and the answer is 'yes, in the right situation'. I think the use in the generator code might be not the right situation. -- Matthias
>
>
> ____________________
>   Racket Users list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>