[racket] generator performance

From: Patrick Useldinger (uselpa.list at gmail.com)
Date: Tue Sep 18 06:19:34 EDT 2012

On 18/09/2012 00:24, Matthias Felleisen wrote:

> On Sep 16, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Patrick Useldinger wrote:
>> Which makes me wonder if continuations are really usable in Racket (in terms of performance)?
> That is a good question, and the answer is 'yes, in the right situation'. I think the use in the generator code might be not the right situation. -- Matthias

Would you consider this to be worth a bug report?

Posted on the users mailing list.