[racket] generator performance

On Sep 16, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Patrick Useldinger wrote:

> Which makes me wonder if continuations are really usable in Racket (in terms of performance)?


That is a good question, and the answer is 'yes, in the right situation'. I think the use in the generator code might be not the right situation. -- Matthias

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4373 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20120917/25db4580/attachment.p7s>