[racket] Efficiency of tight loops in Racket

From: Kevin Tew (tewk at cs.utah.edu)
Date: Mon Jan 17 12:52:18 EST 2011

I'll look into it.

I haven't tried places on windows in some time, I'll bring up to date 
this week.

On 01/17/2011 08:13 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
> I think the real reason is actually much sadder: no one on the core
> team regularly uses windows. Well, until about a month ago, when I
> started using windows for my development tasks so hopefully that'll
> change.
> But I'm not sure what Jos is observing and I was expecting a reply
> from Kevin or Matthew on this -- places are still pretty experimental.
> Robby
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Noel Welsh<noelwelsh at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> I've seen lots of recent commits dealing w/ Windows 7 / 64-bit
>> support, so I expect it is simply time. Windows is not as developer
>> friendly as Unix so likely to receive new features last (as a guess).
>> N.
>> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Jos Koot<jos.koot at telefonica.net>  wrote:
>>> Is there a specific reason why there is no parallel support for place on a
>>> dual core processor with Windows 7.
>>> Thanks, Jos
>> _________________________________________________
>>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
> _________________________________________________
>    For list-related administrative tasks:
>    http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users

Posted on the users mailing list.