[racket] Efficiency of tight loops in Racket

From: Jos Koot (jos.koot at telefonica.net)
Date: Mon Jan 17 11:14:19 EST 2011

Thanks for this info.
Perhaps I should install linux besides windows 7, but I am not sure how to
do that. I am not even sure it is possible. I'm afraid that just trying may
ruin my system. The Windows help desk is not very helpful.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel Welsh [mailto:noelwelsh at gmail.com] 
> Sent: 17 January 2011 15:58
> To: Jos Koot
> Cc: users at racket-lang.org
> Subject: Re: [racket] Efficiency of tight loops in Racket
> I've seen lots of recent commits dealing w/ Windows 7 / 
> 64-bit support, so I expect it is simply time. Windows is not 
> as developer friendly as Unix so likely to receive new 
> features last (as a guess).
> N.
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Jos Koot 
> <jos.koot at telefonica.net> wrote:
> > Is there a specific reason why there is no parallel support 
> for place 
> > on a dual core processor with Windows 7.
> > Thanks, Jos

Posted on the users mailing list.