[racket] REPL and read-line

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Alexandre Moreira <alexandream at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks everyone for your responses. Unfortunately I planned on using
> the REPL as a kind of shell for a little utility I need, so I guess
> I'll only have to live with it.

What additional functionality do you need beyond in your shell beyond
the REPL? Why not just type commands into the REPL directly? I'm a bit
confused by this use case. If you expand on it perhaps we can come up
with an alternative.

N.