From: Jay McCarthy (jay.mccarthy at gmail.com) Date: Tue Nov 27 13:15:09 EST 2007 |
|
As the one responsible for the web-server, I try to make sure my gratuitous changes happen only when we're deep in the dev cycle. This particular round we're in good shape because I added thorough tests and completely updated and fixed the documentation. (Thus, finding out what has changed, why, and how to fix it should be much easier.) So, we should be in a new time of web-server stability. Jay On Nov 27, 2007 10:28 AM, Robby Findler <robby at cs.uchicago.edu> wrote: > Some parts of the system are more stable than others, so there are > fewer of these problems (the web-server, historically speaking, has > not been in this group, but it is better now, I believe). We do try to > keep code from having gratuitous, backwards incompatible changes, but > you're right that in the worst case one has to keep up with SVN. > > Robby > > > On Nov 27, 2007 9:02 AM, Matthew Jadud <Matthew.Jadud at olin.edu> wrote: > > On Nov 27, 2007 12:15 AM, Eric Hanchrow <offby1 at blarg.net> wrote: > > > setup-plt: Error during Compiling .zos for xmlrpc (/home/erich/.plt-scheme/planet/300/371.3/cache/schematics/xmlrpc.plt/3/0) > > > setup-plt: xmlrpc-unit-servlet.ss:7:2: module: cannot provide from a module without a matching `require' at: (lib "sig.ss" "web-server") in: (provide (all-from (lib "unitsig.ss")) (all-from (lib "sig.ss" "web-server")) add-handler handle-xmlrpc-requests) > > > make[1]: *** [install-3m] Error 1 > > > > Hi Eric, > > > > I really thought I cleaned that up. > > > > By the way, to the PLT group: I've always wondered what the best way > > is to keep a library up-to-date; more than once, things have changed > > underneath code relying on the web server library, but the only way > > I've ever found out is when a user writes to complain. How do others > > do it? Should we supposed to be continuously testing our libraries > > against the evolving HEAD of the tree? > > > > (Really, I suspect the answer is "yes", and I just haven't been doing it.) > > > > In this particular case, I thought I had correctly updated things to > > work on 370+. But it's a question I've had for some time, regardless. > > > > Cheers, > > Matt > > > > _________________________________________________ > > For list-related administrative tasks: > > http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme > > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme > -- Jay McCarthy <jay.mccarthy at gmail.com> http://jay.teammccarthy.org