[plt-scheme] v3 Build failure: xmlrpc-unit-servlet.ss:7:2: module: cannot provide from a module without a matching `require'
Excellent!
Robby
On Nov 27, 2007 12:15 PM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccarthy at gmail.com> wrote:
> As the one responsible for the web-server, I try to make sure my
> gratuitous changes happen only when we're deep in the dev cycle. This
> particular round we're in good shape because I added thorough tests
> and completely updated and fixed the documentation. (Thus, finding out
> what has changed, why, and how to fix it should be much easier.) So,
> we should be in a new time of web-server stability.
>
> Jay
>
>
> On Nov 27, 2007 10:28 AM, Robby Findler <robby at cs.uchicago.edu> wrote:
> > Some parts of the system are more stable than others, so there are
> > fewer of these problems (the web-server, historically speaking, has
> > not been in this group, but it is better now, I believe). We do try to
> > keep code from having gratuitous, backwards incompatible changes, but
> > you're right that in the worst case one has to keep up with SVN.
> >
> > Robby
> >
> >
> > On Nov 27, 2007 9:02 AM, Matthew Jadud <Matthew.Jadud at olin.edu> wrote:
> > > On Nov 27, 2007 12:15 AM, Eric Hanchrow <offby1 at blarg.net> wrote:
> > > > setup-plt: Error during Compiling .zos for xmlrpc (/home/erich/.plt-scheme/planet/300/371.3/cache/schematics/xmlrpc.plt/3/0)
> > > > setup-plt: xmlrpc-unit-servlet.ss:7:2: module: cannot provide from a module without a matching `require' at: (lib "sig.ss" "web-server") in: (provide (all-from (lib "unitsig.ss")) (all-from (lib "sig.ss" "web-server")) add-handler handle-xmlrpc-requests)
> > > > make[1]: *** [install-3m] Error 1
> > >
> > > Hi Eric,
> > >
> > > I really thought I cleaned that up.
> > >
> > > By the way, to the PLT group: I've always wondered what the best way
> > > is to keep a library up-to-date; more than once, things have changed
> > > underneath code relying on the web server library, but the only way
> > > I've ever found out is when a user writes to complain. How do others
> > > do it? Should we supposed to be continuously testing our libraries
> > > against the evolving HEAD of the tree?
> > >
> > > (Really, I suspect the answer is "yes", and I just haven't been doing it.)
> > >
> > > In this particular case, I thought I had correctly updated things to
> > > work on 370+. But it's a question I've had for some time, regardless.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________
> > > For list-related administrative tasks:
> > > http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
> > >
> > _________________________________________________
> > For list-related administrative tasks:
> > http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jay McCarthy <jay.mccarthy at gmail.com>
> http://jay.teammccarthy.org
>