[plt-scheme] v3 Build failure: xmlrpc-unit-servlet.ss:7:2: module: cannot provide from a module without a matching `require'

Some parts of the system are more stable than others, so there are
fewer of these problems (the web-server, historically speaking, has
not been in this group, but it is better now, I believe). We do try to
keep code from having gratuitous, backwards incompatible changes, but
you're right that in the worst case one has to keep up with SVN.

Robby

On Nov 27, 2007 9:02 AM, Matthew Jadud <Matthew.Jadud at olin.edu> wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2007 12:15 AM, Eric Hanchrow <offby1 at blarg.net> wrote:
> > setup-plt: Error during Compiling .zos for xmlrpc (/home/erich/.plt-scheme/planet/300/371.3/cache/schematics/xmlrpc.plt/3/0)
> > setup-plt:   xmlrpc-unit-servlet.ss:7:2: module: cannot provide from a module without a matching `require' at: (lib "sig.ss" "web-server") in: (provide (all-from (lib "unitsig.ss")) (all-from (lib "sig.ss" "web-server")) add-handler handle-xmlrpc-requests)
> > make[1]: *** [install-3m] Error 1
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> I really thought I cleaned that up.
>
> By the way, to the PLT group: I've always wondered what the best way
> is to keep a library up-to-date; more than once, things have changed
> underneath code relying on the web server library, but the only way
> I've ever found out is when a user writes to complain. How do others
> do it? Should we supposed to be continuously testing our libraries
> against the evolving HEAD of the tree?
>
> (Really, I suspect the answer is "yes", and I just haven't been doing it.)
>
> In this particular case, I thought I had correctly updated things to
> work on 370+. But it's a question I've had for some time, regardless.
>
> Cheers,
> Matt
>
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>