[plt-scheme] Should < work with just one argument?

At Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:35:01 -0400, Paul Schlie wrote:
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
> 
> > Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
> > In most cases one can write:
> >
> >     (eval `(< -inf.0 ,@(args)))
> 
> Still requires at-least one argument, but likely often good enough.
> 
> (I guess I'm just a fan of "everything syntactically correct,
>  means something", as opposed to generating run-time errors
>  which halt execution by default.)

So C must be your favorite programming language, then?

Robby