[plt-scheme] Should < work with just one argument?

> From: Robby Findler <robby at cs.uchicago.edu>
>> At Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:35:01 -0400, Paul Schlie wrote:
>>> Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
>>> In most cases one can write:
>>> 
>>>     (eval `(< -inf.0 ,@(args)))
>> 
>> Still requires at-least one argument, but likely often good enough.
>> 
>> (I guess I'm just a fan of "everything syntactically correct,
>>  means something", as opposed to generating run-time errors
>>  which halt execution by default.)
> 
> So C must be your favorite programming language, then?

(NOT, but did I set myself up for that one :)