[plt-scheme] Should < work with just one argument?

> Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
> In most cases one can write:
>
>     (eval `(< -inf.0 ,@(args)))

Still requires at-least one argument, but likely often good enough.

(I guess I'm just a fan of "everything syntactically correct,
 means something", as opposed to generating run-time errors
 which halt execution by default.)