[plt-scheme] RE: efficient string operations yielding immutable strings

"Neil W. Van Dyke" <neil at neilvandyke.org> wrote:

> Question: If I were to implement a set of string operation primitives
> that always yield immutable strings, can someone suggest a visually
> lightweight naming convention?  "substring-immutable",
> "string-append-immutable", "string-lowercase-immutable", etc. seem
> bulky.  I don't really want to use a non-alphanumeric character as a
> suffix for this.

The immutable string would obviously be a "strung", the characters
already having been strung together and thus being immutable.

Regards

Michael Burschik