Fwd: [plt-scheme] current-exception-handler

>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> writes:

Matthew>   For list-related administrative tasks:
Matthew>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme

Matthew> At Tue, 25 Mar 2003 06:03:13 -0700, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>> At Tue, 25 Mar 2003 04:04:11 -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>> > BTW#2: if continuation marks were mutable, wouldn't they be the same
>> >        as parameters?
>> 
>> Yes, [...]

Matthew> At Tue, 25 Mar 2003 08:08:48 -0500, John Clements wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, March 25, 2003, at 04:04  AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>> >> BTW#2: if continuation marks were mutable, wouldn't they be the same
>> >>        as parameters?
>> >
>> > No, [...]

Matthew> John's right.

Matthew> I really meant "Yes, continuation marks can be used directly to
Matthew> implement parameters, but not vice-versa."

Can you get the parameter inheritance semantics without redefining
THREAD?

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla