Fwd: [plt-scheme] current-exception-handler

From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu)
Date: Tue Mar 25 08:19:26 EST 2003

At Tue, 25 Mar 2003 06:03:13 -0700, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Tue, 25 Mar 2003 04:04:11 -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > BTW#2: if continuation marks were mutable, wouldn't they be the same
> >        as parameters?
> 
> Yes, [...]

At Tue, 25 Mar 2003 08:08:48 -0500, John Clements wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 25, 2003, at 04:04  AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> >> BTW#2: if continuation marks were mutable, wouldn't they be the same
> >>        as parameters?
> >
> > No, [...]

John's right.

I really meant "Yes, continuation marks can be used directly to
implement parameters, but not vice-versa."

Matthew



Posted on the users mailing list.