From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu) Date: Tue Mar 25 11:35:35 EST 2003 |
|
At Tue, 25 Mar 2003 17:28:55 +0100, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] wrote: > Matthew> I really meant "Yes, continuation marks can be used directly to > Matthew> implement parameters, but not vice-versa." > > Can you get the parameter inheritance semantics without redefining > THREAD? No, I don't think so. I didn't mean to make any technically precise statements, so maybe it's simplest to withdraw all of my comments. :) Matthew
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|