[racket-dev] [plt] Push #24958: master branch updated

What about naming the collection "tuning"?

Robby

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Vincent St-Amour <stamourv at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> I would prefer the full word, "performance".
>
> But with a name like that, I would expect things from
> `racket/unsafe/ops' and `racket/performance-hint' to be there. "Tuning"
> doesn't carry the same expectation (to me, at least).
>
> Vincent
>
>
>
> At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:39:53 -0500,
> Robby Findler wrote:
>>
>> Better than "tools", IMO. How about "perf"? Ie, perf/future-visualizer
>> and perf/optimization-coach/ ?
>>
>> Robby
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Vincent St-Amour <stamourv at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>> > (Performance) tuning?
>> >
>> > Vincent
>> >
>> >
>> > At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:04:46 -0500,
>> > Robby Findler wrote:
>> >>
>> >> tools seems like too generic of a word. Is there something like
>> >> "performance-debugging" that isn't so long?
>> >>
>> >> Robby
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Vincent St-Amour <stamourv at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>> >> > At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 01:33:02 -0400,
>> >> > Eli Barzilay wrote:
>> >> >> Or maybe add a new "tools" collection for other similar things?
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm about to push the new version of Optimization Coach (formerly
>> >> > Performance Report). Since it now works with any language (not just TR),
>> >> > it would make sense to move it outside of the `typed-racket' collect.
>> >> > It would be a good candidate for the `tools' collection.
>> >> >
>> >> > Vincent