[racket-dev] [plt] Push #24958: master branch updated

+1

Vincent


At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:04:11 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
> 
> What about naming the collection "tuning"?
> 
> Robby
> 
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Vincent St-Amour <stamourv at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> > I would prefer the full word, "performance".
> >
> > But with a name like that, I would expect things from
> > `racket/unsafe/ops' and `racket/performance-hint' to be there. "Tuning"
> > doesn't carry the same expectation (to me, at least).
> >
> > Vincent
> >
> >
> >
> > At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:39:53 -0500,
> > Robby Findler wrote:
> >>
> >> Better than "tools", IMO. How about "perf"? Ie, perf/future-visualizer
> >> and perf/optimization-coach/ ?
> >>
> >> Robby
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Vincent St-Amour <stamourv at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> >> > (Performance) tuning?
> >> >
> >> > Vincent
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:04:46 -0500,
> >> > Robby Findler wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> tools seems like too generic of a word. Is there something like
> >> >> "performance-debugging" that isn't so long?
> >> >>
> >> >> Robby
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Vincent St-Amour <stamourv at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> >> >> > At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 01:33:02 -0400,
> >> >> > Eli Barzilay wrote:
> >> >> >> Or maybe add a new "tools" collection for other similar things?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I'm about to push the new version of Optimization Coach (formerly
> >> >> > Performance Report). Since it now works with any language (not just TR),
> >> >> > it would make sense to move it outside of the `typed-racket' collect.
> >> >> > It would be a good candidate for the `tools' collection.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Vincent