[racket-dev] lots of new tests pushed

From: Ryan Culpepper (ryanc at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Mon Apr 25 21:24:38 EDT 2011

I believe that every directory named tests is dropped when making the 
normal distribution, yes.

But most tests already reside in subdirectories of the tests collection, 
whereas the new files were all put in tests subdirectories of each 
collection directory. So now there is both, eg, 
<collects>/tests/macro-debugger and <collects>/macro-debugger/tests.

Ryan


On 04/25/2011 07:15 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
> I thought that they weren't in the normal distribution, only the full one.
>
> Robby
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt<samth at ccs.neu.edu>  wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Robby Findler
>> <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu>  wrote:
>>> On Monday, April 25, 2011, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt<samth at ccs.neu.edu>  wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Robby Findler
>>>> <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu>  wrote:
>>>>> I just pushed tests for all non-racket and non-scheme collections that
>>>>> makes sure that all of the top-level libraries have their exports
>>>>> fully documented. I left out info.rkt and tried to drop obviously bad
>>>>> things from this list, but if you spot problems when drdr complains at
>>>>> you, please just go edit the file to remove libraries that shouldn't
>>>>> be there.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, this is useful.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a benefit to have this spread over all the collections,
>>>> instead of in a directory under "collects/tests"?
>>>
>>> I put them where they are to catch the default responsibilities in
>>> drdr. But I have no other reason.
>>
>> Ah, makes sense. However, this has the drawback that they're in the
>> distribution.  Does that need to be fixed?
>> --
>> sam th
>> samth at ccs.neu.edu
>>
>
> _________________________________________________
>    For list-related administrative tasks:
>    http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev



Posted on the dev mailing list.