[racket-dev] lots of new tests pushed

The dist-spec works on a per directory basis typically (although it
supports what you'd want... we generally don't use that for test), so
those files are in the distribution because their parent is in the
normal distro.

Jay

2011/4/25 Robby Findler <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu>:
> I thought that they weren't in the normal distribution, only the full one.
>
> Robby
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <samth at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Robby Findler
>> <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
>>> On Monday, April 25, 2011, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <samth at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Robby Findler
>>>> <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
>>>>> I just pushed tests for all non-racket and non-scheme collections that
>>>>> makes sure that all of the top-level libraries have their exports
>>>>> fully documented. I left out info.rkt and tried to drop obviously bad
>>>>> things from this list, but if you spot problems when drdr complains at
>>>>> you, please just go edit the file to remove libraries that shouldn't
>>>>> be there.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, this is useful.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a benefit to have this spread over all the collections,
>>>> instead of in a directory under "collects/tests"?
>>>
>>> I put them where they are to catch the default responsibilities in
>>> drdr. But I have no other reason.
>>
>> Ah, makes sense. However, this has the drawback that they're in the
>> distribution.  Does that need to be fixed?
>> --
>> sam th
>> samth at ccs.neu.edu
>>
>
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev



-- 
Jay McCarthy <jay at cs.byu.edu>
Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University
http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay

"The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93