[racket-dev] lots of new tests pushed

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Robby Findler
<robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> I thought that they weren't in the normal distribution, only the full one.

Sorry, my sentence wasn't clear. The tests/ collection isn't in the
normal distribution, but your new tests are.

>
> Robby
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <samth at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Robby Findler
>> <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
>>> On Monday, April 25, 2011, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <samth at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Robby Findler
>>>> <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
>>>>> I just pushed tests for all non-racket and non-scheme collections that
>>>>> makes sure that all of the top-level libraries have their exports
>>>>> fully documented. I left out info.rkt and tried to drop obviously bad
>>>>> things from this list, but if you spot problems when drdr complains at
>>>>> you, please just go edit the file to remove libraries that shouldn't
>>>>> be there.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, this is useful.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a benefit to have this spread over all the collections,
>>>> instead of in a directory under "collects/tests"?
>>>
>>> I put them where they are to catch the default responsibilities in
>>> drdr. But I have no other reason.
>>
>> Ah, makes sense. However, this has the drawback that they're in the
>> distribution.  Does that need to be fixed?
>> --
>> sam th
>> samth at ccs.neu.edu
>>
>



-- 
sam th
samth at ccs.neu.edu