[racket] Performance help

I have now tested using v 6.1.1 and the time does drop to 17s from the
earlier 24s though this still remains higher than Python's 13s.

I have updated the GitHub README with the new numbers.

Jyotirmoy

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Jyotirmoy Bhattacharya <
jyotirmoy at jyotirmoy.net> wrote:

> > On Jan 5, 2015 4:14 AM, "Matthew Flatt" <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > At Sun, 4 Jan 2015 20:18:11 +0100, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
> > > > One possibility: Python hash tables are fast(er).
> > >
> > > That reminds me: I sped up `equal?` hash tables on strings in v6.1.1.
> > >
> > > If Jyotirmoy is using version v6.1 instead of v6.1.1, that could
> > > explain the time differences that he sees versus Greg's times. On my
> > > machine, I get 9.4s for v6.1.1 versus 13.5s for v6.1.
> > >
> > >
> > I am using v6.1. Will try to set up v6.1.1 and measure the timing.
> >
> > Jyotirmoy
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20150111/915a246d/attachment.html>