[racket] SICP (again)

From: Alexander McLin (alex.mclin at gmail.com)
Date: Wed Nov 26 09:17:45 EST 2014

There is some differences between Racket and MIT-Scheme though I don't think it's such a major difference to be a problem.

There is also a Racket SICP compatibility package that makes it more conforming to the book. It's available in the package catalog. I haven't used it so I don't know whether it works or not but it's worth a look.

> On Nov 26, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Catonano <catonano at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 2014-11-26 13:17 GMT+01:00 Alexander McLin <alex.mclin at gmail.com>:
>> The square function is also defined in earlier SICP sections so I would recommend you maintain a running file of all functions SICP defines so you can refer back to them easily.
> 
> Ok, this seems a reasonable approach. Note taken, thanks
> 
> Are there any specific advices you'd give in order to follow the SICP on Racket ?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20141126/7dcf15f3/attachment.html>

Posted on the users mailing list.