<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>There is some differences between Racket and MIT-Scheme though I don't think it's such a major difference to be a problem.</div><div><br></div><div>There is also a Racket SICP compatibility package that makes it more conforming to the book. It's available in the package catalog. I haven't used it so I don't know whether it works or not but it's worth a look.</div><div><br>On Nov 26, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Catonano <<a href="mailto:catonano@gmail.com">catonano@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-11-26 13:17 GMT+01:00 Alexander McLin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alex.mclin@gmail.com" target="_blank">alex.mclin@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">The square function is also defined in earlier SICP sections so I would recommend you maintain a running file of all functions SICP defines so you can refer back to them easily.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Ok, this seems a reasonable approach. Note taken, thanks<br><br>Are there any specific advices you'd give in order to follow the SICP on Racket ?<br></div></div></div></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>