[racket] rudimentary macro Q.

From: Greg Hendershott (greghendershott at gmail.com)
Date: Wed Feb 26 16:03:10 EST 2014

p.s. I didn't mean my reply to disregard what Matthias showed. In
fact, item 2 on my list might simply amount to a more-convenient way
of wrapping just that in a form that's a bit more convenient on the
provider side, and if necessary cooperates automatically on the
require/typed side??

Posted on the users mailing list.