[racket] Help with sockets.

Alejandro Zamora Fonseca wrote at 04/30/2014 09:08 AM:
> Well I want to write a game for programmers that listen input for 
> programs written in any language, I'm still in the "general" modeling 
> phase, but I think the I/O would be based in XML and/or JSON.

If you want it most easily usable from Web apps, I suggest HTTP of 
JSON.  Any other language can handle that fine, too.

XML is harder for almost everyone to deal with than JSON is. Sometimes 
it seems like almost no one designing XML schemas (mainly ad-hoc) uses 
XML in a way more sophisticated than they'd use JSON. And XML has a 
bunch of overbearing baggage.  I only use XML when it's required by 
legacy interoperation, and I don't design anything new using XML.

I somewhat dislike HTTP (and MIME) on a technical level, but 
practically, given its adoption, it often makes tons of sense.  If you 
have a connection-based request-response protocol, and you don't mind 
the HTTP overhead, HTTP's accessibility to Web apps makes it generally 
better than straight TCP.  If you need less overhead or connectionless, 
use straight TCP or UDP.

Neil V.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20140430/862d827b/attachment-0001.html>