[racket] Best canonical package?

From: Jay McCarthy (jay.mccarthy at gmail.com)
Date: Fri Sep 20 17:09:40 EDT 2013

I feel this is hard to answer because there are still different tastes
for what it best. I think the opengl package is pretty good, if
relatively simple to the point where there's not much to do wrong.


On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Anthony Carrico <acarrico at memebeam.org> wrote:
> Is there a package that represents the current best practice for the new
> package system (naming, organizing, modules, submodules, files, docs,
> tests, READMEs, the works)? I know a lot of them were ported forward,
> and this area is evolving. A really decent example would be nice.
> --
> Anthony Carrico
> ____________________
>   Racket Users list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

Jay McCarthy <jay at cs.byu.edu>
Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University

"The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93

Posted on the users mailing list.