[racket] Best canonical package?

I feel this is hard to answer because there are still different tastes
for what it best. I think the opengl package is pretty good, if
relatively simple to the point where there's not much to do wrong.

Jay

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Anthony Carrico <acarrico at memebeam.org> wrote:
> Is there a package that represents the current best practice for the new
> package system (naming, organizing, modules, submodules, files, docs,
> tests, READMEs, the works)? I know a lot of them were ported forward,
> and this area is evolving. A really decent example would be nice.
>
> --
> Anthony Carrico
>
>
> ____________________
>   Racket Users list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>



-- 
Jay McCarthy <jay at cs.byu.edu>
Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University
http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay

"The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93