[racket] Best canonical package?

From: Anthony Carrico (acarrico at memebeam.org)
Date: Fri Sep 20 12:07:01 EDT 2013

Is there a package that represents the current best practice for the new
package system (naming, organizing, modules, submodules, files, docs,
tests, READMEs, the works)? I know a lot of them were ported forward,
and this area is evolving. A really decent example would be nice.

Anthony Carrico

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20130920/4d53648e/attachment.sig>

Posted on the users mailing list.