[racket] Question about sandbox.rktl failing its unit test

I believe this was not related to symbolic links, and has now been fixed.

Sam
On Jul 4, 2013 3:27 AM, "Tim Brown" <tim.brown at cityc.co.uk> wrote:

> On 03/07/13 21:46, Tobias Hammer wrote:
>
>> Have you tried the current HEAD? There were some changes in the handling
>> of symlinks on *nix platforms after 5.3.5 that might fix this.
>>
>
> Thanks for getting back to me.
>
> I'll try that... I haven't looked much further into this, since I didn't
> know whether sandboxes don't play nice with symlinks on purpose. Apache
> HTTPD, for example, looks upon them with deep suspicion.
>
> Is there any merit to this kind of paranoia when it comes to racket?
>
> Tim
>
> --
> Tim Brown <tim.brown at cityc.co.uk>  | City Computing Limited            |
> T: +44 20 8770 2110                | City House, Sutton Park Road      |
> F: +44 20 8770 2130                | Sutton, Surrey, SM1 2AE, GB       |
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
> -----------|
> BEAUTY:  What's in your eye when you have a bee in your hand           |
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
> -----------'
> City Computing Limited registered in London No. 1767817.
> Registered Office: City House, Sutton Park Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM1 2AE
> VAT number 372 8290 34.
> ____________________
>  Racket Users list:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/**users <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20130704/4363ddcd/attachment.html>