[racket] Beginners request for code review.

I tried this a bit (this is why all the constants in bezier-math are
floats) but I didn't notice any improvement. May be that I was using
flonums inconsistently, I'll try once again.
Best regards,
Piotr Klibert


2013/1/31 Jens Axel Søgaard <jensaxel at soegaard.net>:
> 2013/1/31 Carl Eastlund <cce at ccs.neu.edu>:
>> Piotr,
>>
>> This isn't good Racket code, it's *gorgeous*.  That was my impression at
>> first glance, and the more I look, the more I like it.  Your Bezier library
>> absolutely does not read like the code of a novice Racketeer.  Few enough
>> people regularly use a combination of objects, pattern matching, map, cut,
>> macros, contracts, named let, multiple values, submodules... let alone using
>> them all in readable and idiomatic fashion.
>
> I agree with this. Welcome to the club.
>
> I see that in the hunt for performance, you have used macros
> as a form of "manual inlining". It might be worth to experiment
> with fl+, fl* and friends, since they don't need to handle other
> number types, they might give you some extra performance.
>
>     http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/flonums.html
>
> --
> Jens Axel Søgaard