[racket] Rosetta Code

Sounds great! And then we add "does not work for Scheme or Lisp."  :-) 


On Feb 25, 2013, at 5:07 AM, Tim Brown wrote:

> On 24/02/13 15:41, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
>> Another benefit is that it generates this page:
>>   http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Reports:Tasks_not_implemented_in_Racket
>> 
>> Note that some of the pages listed there actually do have Racket
>> solutions, but they may be listed in the Scheme section ATM.
> 
> Do tasks that are implemented in Scheme, but marked with:
> {{works for|Racket}} count against "Tasks_not_implemented_in_Racket".
> 
> If that is so, is there any reason to implement a task in Racket that is
> suitably implemented in Scheme? Maybe then sweep up behind the
> "Implemented in Scheme but works for Racket" to see if there's a more
> Rackety way of doing it.
> 
> Tim Brown