[racket] Rosetta Code

On 24/02/13 15:41, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> Another benefit is that it generates this page:
>    http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Reports:Tasks_not_implemented_in_Racket
>
> Note that some of the pages listed there actually do have Racket
> solutions, but they may be listed in the Scheme section ATM.

Do tasks that are implemented in Scheme, but marked with:
{{works for|Racket}} count against "Tasks_not_implemented_in_Racket".

If that is so, is there any reason to implement a task in Racket that is
suitably implemented in Scheme? Maybe then sweep up behind the
"Implemented in Scheme but works for Racket" to see if there's a more
Rackety way of doing it.

Tim Brown