[racket] Rosetta Code

From: Asumu Takikawa (asumu at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Mon Feb 18 17:27:13 EST 2013

On 2013-02-18 12:47:21 +0000, Tim Brown wrote:
>    I've just had a poke around and seen that Racket is considered a dialect
>    of scheme, and there are many tasks that have the scheme entry marked as
>    "works with racket", but not in a way that shows the task is implemented
>    as a Racket example. (I've just looked at Category:Programming_Languages,
>    and Racket isn't even listed).

It used to be listed as a separate language actually. There was some
dicussion here:

I'm not sure what the policy is, if there is one.


Posted on the users mailing list.