[racket] Would someone prefer paredit shortcuts?

From: (yj_qww6 at 126.com)
Date: Tue Dec 31 23:51:08 EST 2013

I am not familiar with Mac yet, thanks for your prompt.
Now that Command & Option have their own usage and there is a large number of emacs users in Mac,  it seems like what we should do is simply copying the emacs keybindings until a better solution be found.
At 2014-01-01 10:49:08,"Piotr Kalinowski" <pitkali at gmail.com> wrote:
>Robby Findler <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu>
>> Just in case: the package should probably not change the meta/command
>> settings. That is something that only a user should configure
>> explicitly.
>Yeah, I've figured that much after finding that option in preferences.
>> On Tuesday, December 31, 2013, 钟 wrote:
>>> According to the document, Command is mapped to Meta when
>>> 'map-command-as-meta-key' produces #t, or we can use "d:" for command.
>>> It should be better to set it to #t by default while still provide
>>> multiple keybindings.
>I don't think using d: explicitly is a good idea. If you're a mac user
>with command *not* set to be meta, you're probably already using
>semi-habitually d:s for Save, d:r for Run, not to mention all the other
>nice key combinations with d:.
>I actually think providing esc; key bindings here only makes it closer
>to Emacs, where this works exactly as meta. It is also consistent with
>default DrRacket key bindings.
>Piotr Kalinowski
>Intelligence is like a river: the deeper it is, the less noise it makes.
>  Racket Users list:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

Posted on the users mailing list.