[racket] Rationale behind missing string-trim

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Chad Albers <calbers at neomantic.com> wrote:
> While I can 'require' srfi13, I can't import it as is, because sfri-13's
> procedures overlap Racket's string procedures.  I believe Racket's require

Hi Chad,

Try

(require (prefix-in srfi13: srfi/13))

This allows you to prefix everything coming in from a require, and
therefore avoid the kind of conflict you're experiencing. Look at the
docs for "require" for more nifty bits.

Cheers,
Matt