[racket] problem with module language

John,
Thank you.
I've replaced the requirement with clements/sxml2 and am happy to say 
that it works like a charm.
Had to add the sxml:document convenience function and that was it.
Thanks again!
Joop

On 03/26/2012 01:29 AM, John Clements wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Joop Ringelberg wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I try to write a small module language (named: biglooModuleSyntax.scm) in order to be able to run some files with a bigloo module statement in Racket. However, I run into a problem I do not understand at all.
>>
>> The (Bigloo) code loads a library ssax-sxml. In Racket, this must be replaced by: (require (planet "sxml.ss" ("lizorkin" "sxml.plt" 2 1))). The Bigloo code also needs some extra functions not provided by sxml.ss, so I require an additional small module (in missing-ssax-functions.scm). To this end, biglooModuleSyntax.scm contains the following macro:
> This is entirely orthogonal to your question, but I would encourage you to use
>
> (require (planet clements/sxml2))
>
> rather than the outdated sxml PLaneT package.  The differences, in a nutshell:
>
> - MUCH faster install times thanks to simpler dependencies,
> - a bit of error-handling cleanup,
> - some documentation,
>
> ... and possibly other stuff that I've forgotten about.
>
> All the best,
>
> John Clements
>