[racket] Exception Stack Trace Troubles

By 64 bit architecture, I assume it is an intel/amd chip?

What happens if you pass -j on the command-line to racket when you try
this? (You don't have a .racketrc, right?)

Does the test suite pass? You'd run that with

   racket -qr plt/collects/tests/racket/quiet.rktl

(where "plt" is the path to the place where you've installed Racket).

Robby

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Chad Albers <calbers at neomantic.com> wrote:
> Hi Eli,
>
> Here's the file that I'm running in a gist: https://gist.github.com/3003496
>
> In other words, it's a cut-and-paste of code that you posted earlier
> in this chain:
>
> #lang racket
> (with-handlers ([void (λ (e)
>                         (continuation-mark-set->context
>                          (exn-continuation-marks e)))])
>   (+ 1 "two"))
>
>
> Let's say the file is called "example.rkt".  I execute this file using
> the CLI as follows:  racket example.rkt.
>
> That's it.  I'm running Debian linux on 64 bit architecture.  I've
> checked the Debian bug reports on racket, and nothing similar has been
> reported.
>
> Thanks again for your help,
>
> Chad
>
>
> --
> Chad Albers
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
>>
>> Two days ago, Michael Wilber wrote:
>> > If I understand correctly, by default, Racket doesn't provide forms
>> > with stack trace information when running from the CLI by
>> > default.
>>
>> It does (and I tried my examples on both racket and drracket).
>>
>>
>> > Does it work from within DrRacket? If so, look into the errortrace
>> > module, or add (require errortrace) to the top of the .rkt, or run
>> > it like this: racket -l errortrace test.rkt
>>
>> The purpose of errortrace is to provide a more accurate stacktrace
>> (and originally, to provide a trace when mzscheme didn't have one).
>>
>>
>> 9 hours ago, Chad Albers wrote:
>> > I'm using Debian Linux.
>>
>> I tried it now with our debian build (which is an x86_64 build), and
>> it worked.
>>
>>
>> 9 hours ago, Chad Albers wrote:
>> > It doesn't produce a stack trace of DrRacket.
>> >
>> > Also, it doesn't produce a stack trace if I include the errortrace
>> > on the command line.
>>
>> Can you post the exact file that you tried and how you ran it?
>>
>> --
>>          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>>                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
>
> ____________________
>  Racket Users list:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users