[racket] Math library ready for testing
Should I use the bug reporting machinery for small things like this
one, which I assume there will be a bunch in the new docs?
Better a private mail to Neil?
P.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Neil Toronto <neil.toronto at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll fix the type of `processor-count' and change the math docs.
>
> Neil ⊥
>
>
> On 12/12/2012 08:16 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
>>
>> But it could be elided for the docs.
>>
>> Robby
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:33 AM, J. Ian Johnson <ianj at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> I imagine that's there more for Typed Racket's sake.
>>> -Ian
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Pierpaolo Bernardi" <olopierpa at gmail.com>
>>> To: "Neil Toronto" <neil.toronto at gmail.com>
>>> Cc: users at racket-lang.org
>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:17:57 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada
>>> Eastern
>>> Subject: Re: [racket] Math library ready for testing
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Neil Toronto <neil.toronto at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've just pushed the last commits that make the new math library ready
>>>> for
>>>> wider testing. Almost everything ready for use is documented, the tests
>>>> keep
>>>> passing, and everything *seems* to work.
>>>
>>>
>>> (max-math-threads) → Positive-Integer
>>> (max-math-threads num) → void?
>>> num : Positive-Integer
>>>
>>> The maximum number of threads a parallelized math function will
>>> use.
>>> The default value is (max 1 (processor-count))."
>>>
>>> Isn't (max 1 (processor-count)) the same as (processor-count) ?
>>>
>>> Or does Racket runs on machines with less than 1 processors? 8^)
>>>
>>> ____________________
>>> Racket Users list:
>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>>
>>> ____________________
>>> Racket Users list:
>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>
>>
>> ____________________
>> Racket Users list:
>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>
>
> ____________________
> Racket Users list:
> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users