[racket] Math library ready for testing

I'll fix the type of `processor-count' and change the math docs.

Neil ⊥

On 12/12/2012 08:16 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
> But it could be elided for the docs.
>
> Robby
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:33 AM, J. Ian Johnson <ianj at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>> I imagine that's there more for Typed Racket's sake.
>> -Ian
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Pierpaolo Bernardi" <olopierpa at gmail.com>
>> To: "Neil Toronto" <neil.toronto at gmail.com>
>> Cc: users at racket-lang.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:17:57 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>> Subject: Re: [racket] Math library ready for testing
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Neil Toronto <neil.toronto at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I've just pushed the last commits that make the new math library ready for
>>> wider testing. Almost everything ready for use is documented, the tests keep
>>> passing, and everything *seems* to work.
>>
>>          (max-math-threads) → Positive-Integer
>>          (max-math-threads num) → void?
>>            num : Positive-Integer
>>
>>          The maximum number of threads a parallelized math function will use.
>>          The default value is (max 1 (processor-count))."
>>
>> Isn't (max 1 (processor-count)) the same as (processor-count) ?
>>
>> Or does Racket runs on machines with less than 1 processors?   8^)
>>
>> ____________________
>>    Racket Users list:
>>    http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>
>> ____________________
>>    Racket Users list:
>>    http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>
> ____________________
>    Racket Users list:
>    http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>