[racket] deceptive perfomance for typed racket in integer division

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Pierpaolo Bernardi <olopierpa at gmail.com> wrote:

> If you run the test from inside DrRacket, you are measuring DrRacket
> overhead, which is far from negligible.

As an example, the test I just sent, with the limit changed to 60999,
on my machine runs in 20083 ms from inside DrRacket, while the
standalone executable runs in 10350 ms.

P.