[racket] Poll: Does anybody besides Doug use 'plot'?

Neil,

 I don't think that this is the right call, if I understand you correctly.
So, to double check that I understand correctly, are you planning to provide
a compatibility layer for plot with some other name? If so, did you consider
leaving that as the plot library for a few releases to give people time to
migrate what they care about?

Robby

On Friday, September 30, 2011, Neil Toronto <neil.toronto at gmail.com> wrote:
> These two replies seem to sum up the user population that has actually
used the old 'plot'... except for Robby. :D The impression I'm getting is
that the old plot library does little enough that users have been unwilling
or unable to use it for important things. (Generally, of course. And except
for Robby. :D)
>
> I'm going to call the new one 'plot' and break compatibility. I'm
maintaining it, so I'll take responsibility for broken user code and helping
people migrate.
>
> Thanks for your input, everybody.
>
> Neil T
>
> On 09/30/2011 01:15 PM, Eduardo Bellani wrote:
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Same here.
>>
>>> I've used it. Nothing I can't live without. I'm happy for it to
>>> break in the name of progress.
>>>
>>
>>
>> - --
>> Eduardo Bellani
>>
>> omnia mutantur, nihil interit.
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAk6GFW0ACgkQSbLl0kCTjGlbTwCffucNBM9Hb6gLH/QKtzTCdCHv
>> AU8An1ySLEIPnxOKXbeOtXSMSViXLOQQ
>> =6vK3
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20110930/46262b9e/attachment.html>