[racket] Concurrent execution

On Oct 6, 2011, at 4:48 AM, Robby Findler wrote:

> Do you want async-channel, maybe? If not, then rolling your own
> syncronization pattern via the CML-like primitives is the way to go.
> Once you get used to programming with them, they are very easy to use
> and easy to make thread-safe things (contrary to popular wisdom that
> thread-safety is hard to achieve; it is only hard to achieve with bad
> primitives :).

+1

...especially because I've been trying to program *without* those primitives in order to synchronize C & Racket.

John

p.s.: mostly unrelated: Places is awesome. Very clean.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4624 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20111006/2a2a4a19/attachment.p7s>