From: Stefan Schmiedl (s at xss.de) Date: Sun Jan 2 13:23:42 EST 2011 |
|
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 16:30:09 +0100 Stefan Schmiedl <s at xss.de> wrote: > I'm especially curious now, why racket complains about my code, > which is quite similar to what dispatch/servlet (web-server/servlet-dispatch.rkt) > is doing: > > (if stateless? > (make-stateless.servlet servlet-current-directory stuffer manager start) > (make-v2.servlet servlet-current-directory manager start)) > > Why can this library function get away with using the same manager > for both stateful and stateless servlets, and I can't? > > Must be a case of "quod licet Iovi, non licet newbie" (argh). And indeed it is. Obviously I need to read some more about servlets and namespaces. For now I'm content with having a web server that can serve static files, call functions to handle requests or dispatch to different (kinds of) servlets. Not sure that having such a beast run in the wild is such a great idea, though. This is fun :-) s.
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|