[racket] tests/eli-tester feedback (Was: Racket unit testing)

(I have other comments on the Eli's proposal but why you're observing
here is unfortunately already intrenched in Racket; it isn't new
here.)

On Monday, February 14, 2011, Stephen Bloch <sbloch at adelphi.edu> wrote:
>
> On Feb 14, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
>> I figured that
>> a much better solution to avoid some new `/=>' is to have instead a
>> new `true' so that (test E => true) works for any non-#f value.
>
> Umm... isn't redefining "true" sorta like redefining pi to equal 3?  If you're going to create such a magic value, PLEASE call it "non-false" or something instead of "true".
>
>
> Stephen Bloch
> sbloch at adelphi.edu
>
>
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
>