| From: Stephen Bloch (sbloch at adelphi.edu) Date: Mon Feb 14 19:00:57 EST 2011 |
|
On Feb 14, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > I figured that > a much better solution to avoid some new `/=>' is to have instead a > new `true' so that (test E => true) works for any non-#f value. Umm... isn't redefining "true" sorta like redefining pi to equal 3? If you're going to create such a magic value, PLEASE call it "non-false" or something instead of "true". Stephen Bloch sbloch at adelphi.edu
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}