[racket] tests/eli-tester feedback (Was: Racket unit testing)

From: Stephen Bloch (sbloch at adelphi.edu)
Date: Mon Feb 14 19:00:57 EST 2011

On Feb 14, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:

> I figured that
> a much better solution to avoid some new `/=>' is to have instead a
> new `true' so that (test E => true) works for any non-#f value.

Umm... isn't redefining "true" sorta like redefining pi to equal 3?  If you're going to create such a magic value, PLEASE call it "non-false" or something instead of "true".

Stephen Bloch
sbloch at adelphi.edu

Posted on the users mailing list.