[racket] Thoughts on Overeasy

Four hours ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> 
> On Aug 29, 2011, at 6:06 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 
> > I
> > don't see a problem with deciding that
> > 
> >  (test (dynamic-wind foo (λ () X) baz) Y)
> > 
> > is the test case instead of having `test' construct the extra code.
> 
> What if a 100 programmers write a 100 test cases with this pattern: 
> 
>  (test (dynamic-wind <foo:p.n> (lambda () <X:p.n>) <baz:p.n>) <Y:p.n>) 
> 
> Where should this abstraction be defined? -- Matthias

The answer is in the part you snipped.  What's better (assuming some
better name than `before/after'):

  (test #:before foo #:after bar X Y)

  (test (before/after foo bar X) Y)

?

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!