[racket] Thoughts on Overeasy

From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Mon Aug 29 10:14:56 EDT 2011

On Aug 29, 2011, at 6:06 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:

> I
> don't see a problem with deciding that
>  (test (dynamic-wind foo (λ () X) baz) Y)
> is the test case instead of having `test' construct the extra code.

What if a 100 programmers write a 100 test cases with this pattern: 

 (test (dynamic-wind <foo:p.n> (lambda () <X:p.n>) <baz:p.n>) <Y:p.n>) 

Where should this abstraction be defined? -- Matthias

Posted on the users mailing list.