| From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Mon Aug 29 10:14:56 EDT 2011 |
|
On Aug 29, 2011, at 6:06 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > I > don't see a problem with deciding that > > (test (dynamic-wind foo (λ () X) baz) Y) > > is the test case instead of having `test' construct the extra code. What if a 100 programmers write a 100 test cases with this pattern: (test (dynamic-wind <foo:p.n> (lambda () <X:p.n>) <baz:p.n>) <Y:p.n>) Where should this abstraction be defined? -- Matthias
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}