[racket] Typed Racket startup time

I'm in DrRacket 5.1.3 on Windows 7. I don't know how to report a precise
time - is there a way? Absent that I've been going by wall clock and feel.

I can't think of anything I've done that ought to cause my zo's to be
outdated. If you don't see the same effect, I can install a vanilla version
tomorrow or so and see whether its the fault of my configuration. (Can't do
it tonight - Irene knocked out Internet access.)

(And until I confirm that, I shouldn't have called it a ux bug. Sorry.)

--
Pardon terseness and mistakes -- sent from phone.
On Aug 28, 2011 8:25 PM, "Robby Findler" <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu>
wrote:
> FWIW, this is a way to time what you're saying (I believe -- assuming
> you have all your .zos built and you're using a fresh drracket) and
> the difference is not as great as that. Unless maybe there's some
> reason why that test is different?
>
> Last login: Sun Aug 28 11:50:09 on ttys001
> [robby at gaoping] ~$ time racket -l racket
>
> real 0m0.660s
> user 0m0.368s
> sys 0m0.118s
> [robby at gaoping] ~$ time racket -l typed/racket
>
> real 0m1.031s
> user 0m0.719s
> sys 0m0.168s
> [robby at gaoping] ~$
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi <sk at cs.brown.edu>
wrote:
>> In a blank #lang racket buffer, if I hit F5, I get a repl cursor almost
>> instantaneously. If I do the same in typed/racket, it takes roughly three
>> seconds every time. This can't be blamed on parse time since the buffer
is
>> empty! What gives? (And Sam, do you regard this as a ux bug?)
>>
>> --
>> Pardon terseness and mistakes -- sent from phone.
>>
>> _________________________________________________
>>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20110828/7275cb26/attachment.html>