[racket] Typed Racket startup time

FWIW, this is a way to time what you're saying (I believe -- assuming
you have all your .zos built and you're using a fresh drracket) and
the difference is not as great as that. Unless maybe there's some
reason why that test is different?

Last login: Sun Aug 28 11:50:09 on ttys001
[robby at gaoping] ~$ time racket -l racket

real	0m0.660s
user	0m0.368s
sys	0m0.118s
[robby at gaoping] ~$ time racket -l typed/racket

real	0m1.031s
user	0m0.719s
sys	0m0.168s
[robby at gaoping] ~$


On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi <sk at cs.brown.edu> wrote:
> In a blank #lang racket buffer, if I hit F5, I get a repl cursor almost
> instantaneously. If I do the same in typed/racket, it takes roughly three
> seconds every time. This can't be blamed on parse time since the buffer is
> empty! What gives? (And Sam, do you regard this as a ux bug?)
>
> --
> Pardon terseness and mistakes -- sent from phone.
>
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
>